Beden Eğitimi ve Sporda Dijitalleşme
Özet
Beden eğitimi ve sporda dijitalleşme, teknolojinin hızla gelişmesiyle birlikte eğitim, antrenman ve performans süreçlerinde dönüştürücü ve kritik bir role sahip hale gelmiştir. Eğitimciler ve antrenörler teknolojik kaynakları günlük uygulamalarına entegre etmeye çalışırken, bilgi yetersizliği ve adaptasyon zorlukları gibi engellerle karşılaşmaktadır. Teknolojik Pedagojik İçerik Bilgisi (TPACK) çerçevesi; teknoloji, pedagoji ve alan bilgisini dinamik bir dengede birleştirerek öğretim süreçlerinin verimliliğini, öğrenci motivasyonunu ve motor öğrenme becerilerini artırmada etkili çözümler sunmaktadır. Spor biliminde giyilebilir teknolojiler, GPS sistemleri, sensörler ve gelişmiş test cihazları (Gymaware, ForceDecks, Myontec Mbody Pro, NordBord vb.); sporcuların fizyolojik verilerini, kas aktivitelerini, hareket biyomekaniğini ve reaksiyon sürelerini gerçek zamanlı ve yüksek doğrulukla analiz etmeye olanak tanır. Bu teknolojik imkânlar sayesinde performans optimizasyonu, yaralanma tahmini ve önleme ile rehabilitasyon süreçleri bilimsel temellere dayandırılarak yürütülmektedir. Teknolojinin obezite ve hareketsizliğe yol açtığı yönündeki eleştirel görüşlere karşın, dijital yeniliklerin doğru ve amacına uygun kullanımı beden eğitimi ve sporun niteliğini belirgin biçimde yükseltmektedir. Gelecekte bütçe kısıtlılıkları ve teknolojiye erişim engellerinin aşılmasıyla, dijital araçların eğitim müfredatlarına ve spor politikalarına sürdürülebilir şekilde entegre edilmesi büyük bir gerekliliktir.
Digitalization in physical education and sports has assumed a transformative and critical role in education, training, and performance processes alongside the rapid advancement of technology. While educators and coaches endeavor to integrate technological resources into their daily practices, they face obstacles such as lack of knowledge and adaptation challenges. The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework offers effective solutions for enhancing the efficiency of instructional processes, student motivation, and motor learning skills by combining technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge in a dynamic balance. In sports science, wearable technologies, GPS systems, sensors, and advanced testing devices (such as Gymaware, ForceDecks, Myontec Mbody Pro, and NordBord) enable real-time, high-precision analysis of athletes' physiological data, muscle activities, movement biomechanics, and reaction times. Thanks to these technological capabilities, performance optimization, injury prediction and prevention, and rehabilitation processes are conducted on a scientific basis. Contrary to critical views suggesting that technology leads to obesity and sedentary behavior, the correct and purposeful use of digital innovations significantly enhances the quality of physical education and sports. In the future, overcoming budget constraints and access barriers to technology will make the sustainable integration of digital tools into educational curricula and sports policies an essential necessity.
Referanslar
Ak, M. O. (2021). Spor Yönetimi Açısından Teknolojinin Spora Entegresi: Cybathlon Örneği Pearson Journal Of Social Sciences & Humanities, 16, 413-427.
Antala, B., Knjaz, D., Kamenarić, Đ., Bulca, Y., Demirhan, G., Hoe, E. W., Podnar, H., Prskalo, I., ve Seman, F. (2016). Physical education and new technologies. Croatian Kinesiology Association.
Aroganam, G., Manivannan, N., ve Harrison, D. (2019). Review on wearable technology sensors used in consumer sport applications. Sensors, 19(9), 1983.
Ateş, O. Spor Teknolojisi ve İnovasyon ile Kas Yaralanmaları Engellenebilir mi?
Bayram, M., Aka, S. T., ve Şam, C. T. (2019). Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Yüksekokulu Öğrencilerinin Eğitimde Teknoloji Kullanımına İlişkin Tutum Ve Düşüncelerinin İncelenmesi Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi Örneği. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(3), 45-55.
Beighle, A., Morgan, C. F., ve Pangrazi, R. P. (2004). Using pedometers in elementary physical education. Teaching Elementary Physical Education, 15(1), 17-18.
Benson, L. C., Räisänen, A. M., Volkova, V. G., Pasanen, K., ve Emery, C. A. (2020). Workload a-WEAR-ness: monitoring workload in team sports with wearable technology. A scoping review. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 50(10), 549-563.
Bieuzen, F., Borne, R., Toussaint, J.-F., ve Hausswirth, C. (2014). Positive effect of specific low-frequency electrical stimulation during short-term recovery on subsequent high-intensity exercise. Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism, 39(2), 202-210.
Block, B. A. (2008). Using iPods in dance pedagogy. Journal of physical education, recreation & dance, 79(7), 25-28.
Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., ve Armour, K. M. (2017). Rethinking the relationship between pedagogy, technology and learning in health and physical education. Sport, education and society, 22(2), 288-304.
Casey, A., ve Jones, B. (2011). Using digital technology to enhance student engagement in physical education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(2), 51-66.
Dellaserra, C. L., Gao, Y., ve Ransdell, L. (2014). Use of integrated technology in team sports: a review of opportunities, challenges, and future directions for athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 28(2), 556-573.
Enright, E., Hill, J., Sandford, R., ve Gard, M. (2014). Looking beyond what's broken: towards an appreciative research agenda for physical education and sport pedagogy. Sport, education and society, 19(7), 912-926.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational technology research and development, 47(4), 47-61.
Gard, M. (2014). eHPE: A history of the future. Sport, education and society, 19(6), 827-845.
Gibbone, A., Rukavina, P., ve Silverman, S. (2010). Technology integration in secondary physical education: Teachers’ attitudes and practice. Journal of educational technology development and exchange (JETDE), 3(1), 3.
Goud, P. S. H. V., Roopa, Y. M., ve Padmaja, B. (2019). Player Performance Analysis in Sports: With Fusion of Machine Learning and Wearable Technology. Paper presented at the 2019 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC).
Göktaş, Z. (2011). Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğrencilerinin Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerine Yönelik Özgüven Algılamaları
Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 50-57.
Grün, T. v. d., Franke, N., Wolf, D., Witt, N., ve Eidloth, A. (2011). A real-time tracking system for football match and training analysis. In Microelectronic systems (pp. 199-212): Springer.
Hardman, K. (1997). Physical education and socialization-past, present and future in international and comparative perspective. Kinesiology, 29(1), 5-21.
Jones, E., Bulger, S., ve Wyant, J. (2012). Moving beyond the stopwatch and whistle: Examining technology use in teacher training. The Global Journal of Health and Physical Education Pedagogy, 1(3), 210-222.
Kim, W., ve Kim, M. (2017). Sports motion analysis system using wearable sensors and video cameras. Paper presented at the 2017 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC).
Koehler, M., ve Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., ve Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55.
Kos, A., Wei, Y., Tomažič, S., ve Umek, A. (2018). The role of science and technology in sport. Procedia Computer Science, 129, 489-495.
Krause, J. M., O'Neil, K., ve Dauenhauer, B. (2017). Plickers: A formative assessment tool for K–12 and PETE professionals. Strategies, 30(3), 30-36.
Kretschmann, R. (2015). Physical Education Teachers' Subjective Theories about Integrating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into Physical Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(1), 68-96.
Legrain, P., Gillet, N., Gernigon, C., ve Lafreniere, M.-A. (2015). Integration of information and communication technology and pupils’ motivation in a physical education setting. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(3), 384-401.
Li, R. T., Kling, S. R., Salata, M. J., Cupp, S. A., Sheehan, J., ve Voos, J. E. (2016). Wearable performance devices in sports medicine. Sports Health, 8(1), 74-78.
Lightman, K. (2016). Silicon gets sporty. IEEE Spectrum, 53(3), 48-53.
Lortie, D. (1975). Balance of control and autonomy in elementaryschool teaching, Chapter 14. Schoolteacher. In: Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Malone, J. J., Lovell, R., Varley, M. C., ve Coutts, A. J. (2017). Unpacking the black box: applications and considerations for using GPS devices in sport. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 12(s2), S2-18-S12-26.
Melton, B., Harris, H. B. B., Kelly, D., ve Chandler, K. (2015). Evaluating a Physical Activity App in the Classroom: A Mixed Methodological Approach Among. The Physical Educator, 72, 601-620.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of educational research, 62(3), 307-332.
Palao, J. M., Hastie, P. A., Cruz, P. G., ve Ortega, E. (2015). The impact of video technology on student performance in physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(1), 51-63.
Penney, D., ve Chandler, T. (2000). Physical education: What future (s)? Sport, education and society, 5(1), 71-87.
Penney, D., Jones, A., Newhouse, P., ve Cambell, A. (2012). Developing a digital assessment in senior secondary physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(4), 383-410.
Phillips, A., Rodenbeck, M., ve Clegg, B. (2014). Apps for physical education: Teacher tested, kid approved! Column Editor: Brent Heidorn. Strategies, 27(3), 28-31.
Pill, S. (2015). Using Appreciative Inquiry to explore Australian football coaches' experience with game sense coaching. Sport, education and society, 20(6), 799-818.
Pot, N., van Hilvoorde, I., Afonso, J., Koekoek, J., ve Almond, L. (2017). Meaningful movement behaviour involves more than the learning of fundamental movement skills. International Sports Studies, 39(2), 5-20.
Sargent, J., ve Casey, A. (2021). Appreciative inquiry for physical education and sport pedagogy research: a methodological illustration through teachers’ uses of digital technology. Sport, education and society, 26(1), 45-57.
Schempp, P. G., ve Graber, K. C. (1992). Teacher socialization from a dialectical perspective: Pretraining through induction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 11(4), 329-348.
Ulucan, H., ve Karabulut, E. O. (2012). Beden eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının eğitim teknolojisi standartları ile ilgili özyeterliklerinin incelenmesi.
van Hilvoorde, I., ve Koekoek, J. (2018). Digital technologies: A challenge for physical education. Changes in childhood and adolescence: Current challenges for physical education, 54-63.
Windt, J., MacDonald, K., Taylor, D., Zumbo, B. D., Sporer, B. C., ve Martin, D. T. (2020). “To tech or not to tech?” A critical decision-making framework for implementing technology in sport. Journal of Athletic Training, 55(9), 902-910.
Wintle, J. (2019). Digital technology in physical education: global perspectives. In: Taylor & Francis.
Wyant, J., ve Baek, J.-H. (2019). Re-thinking technology adoption in physical education. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 10(1), 3-17.
Xuehan, P. (2007). The application of new materials and the development of competitive sports [J]. Journal of Guangzhou Sport University, 1, 102-104.
Zhang, T. (2021). Research on the Application of Science and Technology in Competitive Sports. Journal of Frontiers in Sport Research, 1(1), 59-62.
Performbetter .Erişim Tarihi: (11/11/2022 22:00).https://performbetter.co.uk/
